atenolol nombre comercial costa rica vademecum gabapentin 300 mg singulair 5 mg prospecto propranolol dose in hemiplegia how long does it take augmentin to treat prostatitis does 5mg of lexapro work 100 mg clomid heavy bleeding on cd17 male hair shed with avodart buy plavix with discount does apri desogen shrink ovarian cysts generic levitra manufacturer india can biotech ciprofloxacin clean sperms in your stomach furosemide 20 mg uk cdyfar cyproheptadine hcl obat apa which is better for anger effexor or bupropion starlix 120 mg nedir why do u have to ramp up dose of topamax naprosyn 750 mg nedir clomid 6 days late allegra 25r error 80 acyclovir mg carvedilol cause chest tightness should i stop taking sertraline price walmart can ciprodex ear drop cause heart problem paroxetine day 6 buy accutane online canada pharmacy acyclovir dosage for stomatitis 800mg voltaren 75mg dr escitalopram for perimenopause been on paxil 20 years diflucan 600 mg isotretinoin product in malaysia is it safe to take clonidine an sertraline together why use topamax fibromyalgia powder antibiotics for cats wholeseller celexa 3rd trimester ixel ve cymbalta ayni anda kullanilir mi how long does it take prednisone to work for asthma diflucan 100 mg tablets price in pakistan why metolazone before lasix cara mengobati jerawat dengan azithromycin amitriptyline 800mg suppressive therapy of valacyclovir 500 mg dose for augmentin in th treatment of chlamydia can u get high off of mirtazapine 45 mg of snort them does zyprexa help flashbacks 10mg prednisone weightloss nd lasix priligy kopen prometrium 100mg what is it used for tab allegra 120 mg dosage for kif wellbutrin xl course dosage of septra bladder short course zovirax 800 pour aphtes what happen if u snort topiramate metoprolol memory loss lisinopril side effects false lh surge on clomid is acyclovir available in france over the counter propecia finasteride generic low price lexapro epistaxis what can i do to help clomid plus metformin work fast tenormin 100 prezzo tamsulosin combined to finasteride manufacturers europe citalopram 3rd trimester buspar for cats side effects proscar sperma prices cialis canada cheap cialis 20mg online meloxicam equals to percocet amitriptyline online no prescription despues de tomar cytotec cuando dura sangrado mylan generic wellbutrin reviews order propecia cost cytotec pastillas schwanderinsurp?how-fast-will-1000-mg-augmentin-work-for-bladder.doc'>how fast will 1000 mg augmentin work for bladder do i take the 400mg flagyl all at once hydrochlorothiazide in the philippines buspar 15 mg twice a day tetracycline generic brand name mayo clinic nexium tablets 40mg el propranolol se usa para colesterol alto de 40 mg amoxil and diflucan is diflucan used to treat nasal fungus propecia for sale online prednisone for sale 3mg sertraline zoloft side effects zofran cost uk plavix deadline albuterol in breathing treatment dose for a 4 month old is escitalopram 10 mg harmful to dogs celexa mg to zoloft mg does atorvastatin calcium replace vytorin tabs citalopram hydrobromide making tongue numb viagra 50 dlm bhs indonesia ketoconazole 200 mg tablets for dogs amoxicillin 875 for a 15 year old harga cymbalta dan lyrica is metronidazole 500 mg safe in pregnant women en que drogueria puedo comprar cytotec en armenia dose of flomax used in kidney stones im htn i use nefedipine and hydrochlorothiazide i azithromycin for gastroparesis dosing propranolol e hiperglicemia ciprofloxacin to cure infection orinaria priligy tablets in belgium baclofen pump canada roaccutane 20mg tabletky cena how ciproxin 500 mg antibiotic increases the hunger ivermectin pills can kill scabies leukopenia cymbalta buy dapoxetine 60mg online diltiazem sr 120 mg side effects starting femara on day 4 can i drink alcohol while taking novamoxin amoxicillin can i take zoloft can you take ibuprofen and midol parachuting wellbutrin price list of viagra cialis in westbengal can lamisil cream give you dry mouth levitra online canadian pharmacy anastrozole 1mg tablets generic arimidex tamoxifen and factor v leiden together amoxil 500 mg castellano costo de orlista xenical 120 mg lasix 20 mg for dogs value of baclofen 20 mg does plavix affect snake bite que es phenergan 12 day puppies constipated from amoxicillin what to do can i cut a diovan hct tab propecia cost walmart 1600 gabapentin cost without insurance montelukast 54 157 lexahist cyproheptadine hcl obat apa does erythromycin contain steroids propranolol fear of flying lasix coughing mucus gluten and amoxicillin conn cyclobenzaprine with 20 mg celexa sertraline hydrochloride ep monograph buy clomid in the philippines can i use diflucan for jock itch gabapentin 5027 desyrel 50 mg 30 tablet faydalar?± lexapro citalopram side effects best time to take glucophage for bodybuilder amoxicillin dosage for swimmners ear will viagra work if nervous lowering cymbalta dosage to 20 mg toenail fungus lamisil cream valacyclovir for strep throat objawy uczulenia na amoxicillin what is novo gabapentin 100mg used on dogs for allegra in dengue misoprostol side effects propranolol injection use clomid hoe drink mens hom augmentin 357 lamisil nose bleed kegunaan voltaren 50 mg gel how many minutes does it take lasix to work on dogs 2 year old chest infection strong antibiotics chloromycetin applicaps usage reacciones secundarias de zestril de 5 mgrs. lumont montelukast can cialis maintain erection after ejaculation dose conversion for iv po lasix purchase clomid australia formulation and evaluation of dutasteride soft capsule dosage of azithromycin for strep throat voltaren 125 diclofenac natr ciprofloxacin how does it work ativan and valtrex bactrim philippine price biovail zovirax sample for physician ketoconazole manufacturer usa have back pain after using clomid 50mg cheapest viagra online in uk cytotec 4 mycoral ketoconazole cream price tadalafil tablets for conception piroxicam 0.5 gel price on much money do lisinopril companies make provera2.5 for sale cheap precio medicamento cymbalta y effexor took diflucan 150mg 2 days ago ok to take another cyproheptadine hydrochloride buy uk zemyc fluconazole cara pakai buy neurontin online glimepiride price in india cialis made my wife have headache neurontin side effects after one day target azithromycin suspension cost merck metformin patent bactrim to eradicate pylori bacteria cyproheptadine eye drop brand name buy nolvadex from canada singulair 30 day free coupon celebrex and ejactulation furosemide bahasa indonesia buy cheap nolvadex no prescription what is the real shelf life of metronidazole does viagra work if you masturabate too much kamagra pareri when can i drink after septra cardizem cd and lipitor isotretinoin tablets 10mg to buy in the philippines prednisone taper schedule 5 mg abz antibiotic medicine mobic meloxicam can you get high can a man ejaculate while on azithromycin does viagra make you cum more than once bactrim for uti prevention metformin 500 mg uses for pregnancy cialis online with no prescription abscess levofloxacin pancreatic nursing implications of avapro buspirone polski 40 mg propranolol side effects the current selling price of flagyl injection veteran levitra buy zovirax cream linezolid solubility study ketoconazole shampoo and liver cancer levaquin 10 day dose amoxicillin pharex is it safe to travel with cialis in my system chloramphenicol 500 ultram spasmes cymbalta amitriptyline wellbutrin and alcohol montelukast side effects 2 year old 10 mg 3 days for azithromycin for root canal infection xenical 120 how long does it take for hair to fall after propecia olanzapine 10 mg thuoc conjugated linoleic acid canada ivermectin 1 50ml does 10 mg of prozac work pastile kamagra gold avodart breast enlargement antibiotics dogs side effect bleeding metronidazole viagra prices from canada lc citalopram hbr 10mg where was celebrex commerficial filmed viagra medicin at west bengal montelukast sodium vs salbutamol allegra 30 mg pediatrico wellbutrin urinary problems tamoxifen annual sales viagra generic philippines 30mg of priligy review ketoconazole lotion novale scalp lotion price can i take nuquill with antibiotic how to get hold of terbinafine tablets in south africa thuoc digoxin sandoz 4 month old pneumonia azithromycin is valacyclovir used to treat canker sores harga nexium 50 mg di indonesia amoxicillin ora suspension cat dosage uti what is liquid albuterol danger of taking finasteride can you take ciprofloxacin for yeast infection flagyl 400mg did they work fluconazole and c diff what does burning mouth from prozac feel like normal neurontin side effects cipro or levaquin for tooth abscess order viagra online india cuanto cuesta el cytotec en farmacias del ahorro telmisartan 50 plavix peak sales apa khasiat dari chloramphenicol palmitat escitalopram 250 tetracycline 250 mg tablets famciclovir prices south africa acyclovir paten mylan bupropion xl reviews how many ml of zofran can a 3 year old have converting coreg to metoprolol succinate where can i get amoxicillin over the counter uk harga salep acyclovir ibuprofen 800 for gabapentin withdrawal prometrium at 6 weeks lexapro liquid australia meloxicam dosage philippines qualitest montelukast sodium 10mg tablet gabapentin 400 mg for dog dosing viagra cheap online no prescription SUNNYDUVET.COM 40mg accutane for 4 months buy cialis daily uk diovan 80 mg uses kamagra online bestellen g??nstig manfaat obat cyproheptadine hcl wellbutrin sr vs generic bupropion obat dexamethasone 05 side effect of cyproheptadine ticholinecitrate sorb dose for tetracycline for lyme doxycycline hyclate skin tingling viagra tablets london does hot weather bother someone taking prednisone does doxycycline cause fluid retention does cialis work better the second day can allopurinol 100mg be taken with lisinopril levaquin osteomyelitis mssa ciprofloxacin 500mg antibiotics side effects in dogs nizoral cream price strattera give u the say high as adderall buy propecia mastercard how long to take levaquin cor a uti estradiol 50 micrograminduction of labour what is purpose of clomid tablet how to use dapoxetine hydrochloride azithromycin tokyo estradiol 2mg nuvaring use breakthrough bleeding antidepressants and liver enzymes how much is bactrim ds without insurance purchase amitriptyline online remeron obat rizatriptan recreational generic viagra 24 hours doxycycline hyclate 200mg bid amoxicillin syrup conc in egypt cost zyvox sildenafilo 200 mg efectos cialis tablets 20mg price verapamil tablet price nitroglycerin lingual spray cost tamsulosin al 0, 4 mg misoprostol puede matar how to stop taking topiramate 25mg how much amoxicillin for bronchitis for 4 year old ciprodex cat viagra generic in canada cipralex bupropion dose cuantas dosis de misoprostol vienen en una caja lamisil difficult swallow how long can a 800 mg neurontin stay in your urine buy misoprostol australia prednisone for dogs for sale uk fungsi digoxin o5 mg zithromax online order what is amoxicillin 500mg cap sandoz used for is it safe to take levitra and antidepressants pfizer brand viagra montelukast 10 mg prospecto atorvastatin price in india buy topamax cheap no prescription metformine without food cialis online vancouver allegra 90 mg solubilidad del finasteride cuanto sale el linezolid nizoral. ketaconazol ketaconazole 400 ovulos composition of atarax tabs antibiotic for costochondritis ear prednisone 10 mg 6 day dose pack que farmacias de hermosillo tiene la pastilla priligy para que sirbe la crema lamisil normal dosage of prednisone for bells palsy albuterol and a 4 year old clomid dosage for men neo metformin dipyridamole persantine 25 mg how long does it take for azithromycin to kill pnemoni

Pius XII and the Jews

Contrary to the books accusing Pius XII of not doing enough to help the Jews during the Holocaust, the truth is that Pius XII was instrumental in saving hundreds of thousands of Jews from death at Nazi hands.
by Rabbi David G. Dalin | Source:
Even before Pius XII died in 1958, the charge that his papacy had been friendly to the Nazis was circulating in Europe, a piece of standard Communist agitprop against the West. It sank for a few years under the flood of tributes, from Jews and gentiles alike, that followed the popes death, only to bubble up again with the 1963 debut of The Deputy, a play by a left-wing German writer (and former member of the Hitler Youth)named Rolf Hochhuth.

The Deputy was fictional and highly polemical, claiming that Pius XIIs concern for Vatican finances left him indifferent to the destruction of European Jewry. But Hochhuths seven-hour play nonetheless received considerable notice, sparking a controversy that lasted through the 1960s.

And now, more than thirty years later, that controversy has suddenly broken out again, for reasons not immediately clear. Indeed, "broken out" doesnt describe the current torrent. In the last eighteen months, nine books that treat Pius XII have appeared: John Cornwells Hitlers Pope, Pierre Blets Pius XII and the Second World War, Garry Willss Papal Sin, Margherita Marchiones Pope Pius XII, Ronald J. Rychlaks Hitler, the War and the Pope, Michael Phayers The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930-1965, Susan Zuccottis Under His Very Windows, Ralph McInernys The Defamation of Pius XII, and, most recently, James Carrolls Constantines Sword.

Since four of these the ones by Blet, Marchione, Rychlak, and McInerny are defenses of the pope (and two, the books by Wills and Carroll, take up Pius only as part of a broad attack against Catholicism), the picture may look balanced. In fact, to read all nine is to conclude that Piuss defenders have the stronger case with Rychlaks Hitler, the War and the Pope the best and most careful of the recent works, an elegant tome of serious, critical scholarship. Still, the books vilifying the pope have received most of the attention, particularly Hitlers Pope, a widely reviewed volume marketed with the announcement that Pius XII was "the most dangerous churchman in modern history," without whom "Hitler might never have . . . been able to press forward." The "silence" of the pope is becoming more and more firmly established as settled opinion in the American media: "Pius XIIs elevation of Catholic self-interest over Catholic conscience was the lowest point in modern Catholic history," the New York Times remarked, almost in passing, in a review last month of Carrolls Constantines Sword .

Curiously, nearly everyone pressing this line today from the ex-seminarians John Cornwell and Garry Wills to the ex-priest James Carroll is a lapsed or angry Catholic. For Jewish leaders of a previous generation, the campaign against Pius XII would have been a source of shock. During and after the war, many well-known Jews Albert Einstein, Golda Meir, Moshe Sharett, Rabbi Isaac Herzog, and innumerable others publicly expressed their gratitude to Pius.

In his 1967 book Three Popes and the Jews, the diplomat Pinchas Lapide (who served as Israeli consul in Milan and interviewed Italian Holocaust survivors) declared Pius XII "was instrumental in saving at least 700,000, but probably as many as 860,000 Jews from certain death at Nazi hands." This is not to say that Eugenio Pacelli the powerful churchman who served as nuncio in Bavaria and Germany from 1917 to 1929, then as Vatican secretary of state from 1930 to 1939, before becoming Pope Pius XII six months before World War II began was as much a friend to the Jews as John Paul II has been. Nor is it to say that Pius was ultimately successful as a defender of Jews. Despite his desperate efforts to maintain peace, the war came, and, despite his protests against German atrocities, the slaughter of the Holocaust occurred. Even without benefit of hindsight, a careful study reveals that the Catholic Church missed opportunities to influence events, failed to credit fully the Nazis intentions, and was infected in some of its members with a casual anti-Semitism that would countenance and, in a few horrifying instances, affirm the Nazi ideology.

But to make Pius XII a target of our moral outrage against the Nazis, and to count Catholicism among the institutions delegitimized by the horror of the Holocaust, reveals a failure of historical understanding. Almost none of the recent books about Pius XII and the Holocaust is actually about Pius XII and the Holocaust. Their real topic proves to be an intra-Catholic argument about the direction of the Church today, with the Holocaust simply the biggest club available for liberal Catholics to use against traditionalists. A theological debate about the future of the papacy is obviously something in which non-Catholics should not involve themselves too deeply. But Jews, whatever their feelings about the Catholic Church, have a duty to reject any attempt to usurp the Holocaust and use it for partisan purposes in such a debate particularly when the attempt disparages the testimony of Holocaust survivors and spreads to inappropriate figures the condemnation that belongs to Hitler and the Nazis.

The technique for recent attacks on Pius XII is simple. It requires only that favorable evidence be read in the worst light and treated to the strictest test, while unfavorable evidence is read in the best light and treated to no test. So, for instance, when Cornwell sets out in Hitlers Pope to prove Pius an anti-Semite (an accusation even the pontiffs bitterest opponents have rarely leveled), he makes much of Pacellis reference in a 1917 letter to the "Jewish cult" as though for an Italian Catholic prelate born in 1876 the word "cult" had the same resonances it has in English today, and as though Cornwell himself does not casually refer to the Catholic cult of the Assumption and the cult of the Virgin Mary.

(The most immediately helpful part of Hitler, the War and the Pope may be the thirty-page epilogue Rychlak devotes to demolishing this kind of argument in Hitlers Pope.) The same pattern is played out in Susan Zuccottis Under His Very Windows. For example: There exists testimony from a Good Samaritan priest that Bishop Giuseppe Nicolini of Assisi, holding a letter in his hand, declared that the pope had written to request help for Jews during the German roundup of Italian Jews in 1943. But because the priest did not actually read the letter, Zuccotti speculates that the bishop may have been deceiving him and thus that this testimony should be rejected.

Compare this skeptical approach to evidence with her treatment, for example, of a 1967 interview in which the German diplomat Eitel F. Mollhausen said he had sent information to the Nazis ambassador to the Vatican, Ernst von Weizscker, and "assumed" that Weizscker passed it on to Church "officials." Zuccotti takes this as unquestionable proof that the pope had direct foreknowledge of the German roundup. (A fair reading suggests Pius had heard rumors and raised them with the Nazi occupiers. Princess Enza Pignatelli Aragona reported that when she broke in on the pope with the news of the roundup early on the morning of October 16, 1943, his first words were: "But the Germans had promised not to touch the Jews!") With this dual standard, recent writers have little trouble arriving at two pre-ordained conclusions. The first is that the Catholic Church must shoulder the blame for the Holocaust: "Pius XII was the most guilty," as Zuccotti puts it. And the second is that Catholicisms guilt is due to aspects of the Church that John Paul II now represents.

Indeed, in the concluding chapter of Hitlers Pope and throughout Papal Sin and Constantines Sword, the parallel comes clear: John Pauls traditionalism is of a piece with Piuss alleged anti-Semitism; the Vaticans current stand on papal authority is in a direct line with complicity in the Nazis extermination of the Jews. Faced with such monstrous moral equivalence and misuse of the Holocaust, how can we not object? It is true that during the controversy over The Deputy and again during the Vaticans slow hearing of the case for his canonization (ongoing since 1965), Pius had Jewish detractors.

In 1964, for example, Guenter Lewy produced The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany, and, in 1966, Saul Friedlnder added Pius XII and the Third Reich. Both volumes claimed that Piuss anti-communism led him to support Hitler as a bulwark against the Russians. As accurate information on Soviet atrocities has mounted since 1989, an obsession with Stalinism seems less foolish than it may have in the mid-1960s. But, in fact, the evidence has mounted as well that Pius accurately ranked the threats. In 1942, for example, he told a visitor, "The Communist danger does exist, but at this time the Nazi danger is more serious."

He intervened with the American bishops to support lend-lease for the Soviets, and he explicitly refused to bless the Nazi invasion of Russia. (The charge of overheated anti-communism is nonetheless still alive: In Constantines Sword, James Carroll attacks the 1933 concordat Hitler signed for Germany by asking, "Is it conceivable that Pacelli would have negotiated any such agreement with the Bolsheviks in Moscow?" apparently not realizing that in the mid-1920s, Pacelli tried exactly that.)In any case, Pius had his Jewish defenders as well. In addition to Lapides Three Popes and the Jews, one might list A Question of Judgment, the 1963 pamphlet from the Anti-Defamation Leagues Joseph Lichten, and the excoriating reviews of Friedlnder by Livia Rotkirchen, the historian of Slovakian Jewry at Yad Vashem. Jeno Levai, the great Hungarian historian, was so angered by accusations of papal silence that he wrote Pius XII Was Not Silent (published in English in 1968), with a powerful introduction by Robert M.W. Kempner, deputy chief U.S. prosecutor at Nuremberg.

In response to the new attacks on Pius, several Jewish scholars have spoken out over the last year. Sir Martin Gilbert told an interviewer that Pius deserves not blame but thanks. Michael Tagliacozzo, the leading authority on Roman Jews during the Holocaust, added, "I have a folder on my table in Israel entitled Calumnies Against Pius XII.. . . Without him, many of our own would not be alive." Richard Breitman (the only historian authorized to study U.S. espionage files from World War II) noted that secret documents prove the extent to which "Hitler distrusted the Holy See because it hid Jews."

Still, Lapides 1967 book remains the most influential work by a Jew on the topic, and in the thirty-four years since he wrote, much material has become available in the Vaticans archives and elsewhere. New oral-history centers have gathered an impressive body of interviews with Holocaust survivors, military chaplains, and Catholic civilians. Given the recent attacks, the time has come for a new defense of Piusbecause, despite allegations to the contrary, the best historical evidence now confirms both that Pius XII was not silent and that almost no one at the time thought him so.

In January 1940, for instance, the pope issued instructions for Vatican Radio to reveal "the dreadful cruelties of uncivilized tyranny" the Nazis were inflicting on Jewish and Catholic Poles. Reporting the broadcast the following week, the Jewish Advocate of Boston praised it for what it was: an "outspoken denunciation of German atrocities in Nazi Poland, declaring they affronted the moral conscience of mankind." The New York Times editorialized: "Now the Vatican has spoken, with authority that cannot be questioned, and has confirmed the worst intimations of terror which have come out of the Polish darkness." In England, the Manchester Guardian hailed Vatican Radio as "tortured Polands most powerful advocate." Any fair and thorough reading of the evidence demonstrates that Pius XII was a persistent critic of Nazism. Consider just a few highlights of his opposition before the war: Of the forty-four speeches Pacelli gave in Germany as papal nuncio between 1917 and 1929, forty denounced some aspect of the emerging Nazi ideology.

In March 1935, he wrote an open letter to the bishop of Cologne calling the Nazis "false prophets with the pride of Lucifer." That same year, he assailed ideologies "possessed by the superstition of race and blood" to an enormous crowd of pilgrims at Lourdes. At Notre Dame in Paris two years later, he named Germany "that noble and powerful nation whom bad shepherds would lead astray into an ideology of race."

The Nazis were "diabolical," he told friends privately. Hitler "is completely obsessed," he said to his long-time secretary, Sister Pascalina. "All that is not of use to him, he destroys; . . . this man is capable of trampling on corpses." Meeting in 1935 with the heroic anti-Nazi Dietrich von Hildebrand, he declared, "There can be no possible reconciliation" between Christianity and Nazi racism; they were like "fire and water." The year after Pacelli became secretary of state in 1930, Vatican Radio was established, essentially under his control. The Vatican newspaper LOsservatore Romano had an uneven record, though it would improve as Pacelli gradually took charge (extensively reporting Kristallnacht in 1938, for example). But the radio station was always good making such controversial broadcasts as the request that listeners pray for the persecuted Jews in Germany after the 1935 Nuremberg Legislation.

It was while Pacelli was his predecessors chief adviser that Pius XI made the famous statement to a group of Belgian pilgrims in 1938 that "anti-Semitism is inadmissible; spiritually we are all Semites." And it was Pacelli who drafted Pius XIs encyclical Mit brennender Sorge, "With Burning Concern," a condemnation of Germany among the harshest ever issued by the Holy See.

Indeed, throughout the 1930s, Pacelli was widely lampooned in the Nazi press as Pius XIs "Jew-loving" cardinal, because of the more than fifty-five protests he sent the Germans as the Vatican secretary of state.To these must be added highlights of Pius XIIs actions during the war: His first encyclical, Summi Pontificatus, rushed out in 1939 to beg for peace, was in part a declaration that the proper role of the papacy was to plead to both warring sides rather than to blame one. But it very pointedly quoted St. Paul "there is neither Gentile nor Jew" - using the word "Jew" specifically in the context of rejecting racial ideology. The New York Times greeted the encyclical with a front-page headline on October 28, 1939: "Pope Condemns Dictators, Treaty Violators, Racism." Allied airplanes dropped thousands of copies on Germany in an effort to raise anti-Nazi sentiment. In 1939 and 1940, Pius acted as a secret intermediary between the German plotters against Hitler and the British. He would similarly risk warning the Allies about the impending German invasions of Holland, Belgium, and France.

In March 1940, Pius granted an audience to Joachim von Ribbentrop, the German foreign minister and the only high-ranking Nazi to bother visiting the Vatican. The Germans understanding of Piuss position, at least, was clear: Ribbentrop chastised the pope for siding with the Allies. Whereupon Pius began reading from a long list of German atrocities. "In the burning words he spoke to Herr Ribbentrop," the New York Times reported on March 14, Pius "came to the defense of Jews in Germany and Poland."

When French bishops issued pastoral letters in 1942 attacking deportations, Pius sent his nuncio to protest to the Vichy government against "the inhuman arrests and deportations of Jews from the French-occupied zone to Silesia and parts of Russia." Vatican Radio commented on the bishops letters six days in a row at a time when listening to Vatican Radio was a crime in Germany and Poland for which some were put to death. ("Pope Is Said to Plead for Jews Listed for Removal from France," the New York Times headline read on August 6, 1942. "Vichy Seizes Jews; Pope Pius Ignored," the Times reported three weeks later.) In retaliation, in the fall of 1942, Goebbelss office distributed ten million copies of a pamphlet naming Pius XII as the "pro-Jewish pope" and explicitly citing his interventions in France.

In the summer of 1944, after the liberation of Rome but before the wars end, Pius told a group of Roman Jews who had come to thank him for his protection: "For centuries, Jews have been unjustly treated and despised. It is time they were treated with justice and humanity, God wills it and the Church wills it. St. Paul tells us that the Jews are our brothers. They should also be welcomed as friends."

As these and hundreds of other examples are disparaged, one by one, in recent books attacking Pius XII, the reader loses sight of the huge bulk of them, their cumulative effect that left no one, the Nazis least of all, in doubt about the popes position. A deeper examination reveals the consistent pattern. Writers like Cornwell and Zuccotti see the popes 1941 Christmas address, for example, as notable primarily for its failure to use the language we would use today. But contemporary observers thought it quite explicit. In its editorial the following day, the New York Times declared, "The voice of Pius XII is a lonely voice in the silence and darkness enveloping Europe this Christmas. . . . In calling for a real new order based on liberty, justice, and love,. . . the pope put himself squarely against Hitlerism.

"So, too, the popes Christmas message the following year in which he expressed his concern "for those hundreds of thousands who, without any fault of their own, sometimes only by reason of their nationality or race, are marked down for death or progressive extinction" was widely understood to be a public condemnation of the Nazi extermination of the Jews. Indeed, the Germans themselves saw it as such: "His speech is one long attack on everything we stand for. . . . He is clearly speaking on behalf of the Jews. . . . He is virtually accusing the German people of injustice toward the Jews, and makes himself the mouthpiece of the Jewish war criminals," an internal Nazi analysis reads. This Nazi awareness, moreover, had potentially dire consequences.

There were ample precedents for the pope to fear an invasion: Napoleon had besieged the Vatican in 1809, capturing Pius VII at bayonet point; Pius IX fled Rome for his life after the assassination of his chancellor; and Leo XIII was driven into temporary exile in the late nineteenth century. Still, Pius XII was "ready to let himself be deported to a concentration camp, rather than do anything against his conscience," Mussolinis foreign minister railed. Hitler spoke openly of entering the Vatican to "pack up that whole whoring rabble," and Pius knew of the various Nazi plans to kidnap him.

Ernst von Weizscker has written that he regularly warned Vatican officials against provoking Berlin. The Nazi ambassador to Italy, Rudolf Rahn, similarly describes one of Hitlers kidnapping plots and the effort by German diplomats to prevent it. General Carlo Wolff testified to having received orders from Hitler in 1943 to "occupy as soon as possible the Vatican and Vatican City, secure the archives and the art treasures, which have a unique value, and transfer the pope, together with the Curia, for their protection, so that they cannot fall into the hands of the Allies and exert a political influence." Early in December 1943, Wolff managed to talk Hitler out of the plan.In assessing what actions Pius XII might have taken, many (I among them) wish that explicit excommunications had been announced.

The Catholic-born Nazis had already incurred automatic excommunication, for everything from failure to attend Mass to unconfessed murder to public repudiation of Christianity. And, as his writings and table-talk make clear, Hitler had ceased to consider himself a Catholicindeed, considered himself an anti-Catholic long before he came to power. But a papal declaration of excommunication might have done some good.Then again, it might not.

Don Luigi Sturzo, founder of the Christian Democratic movement in wartime Italy, pointed out that the last times "a nominal excommunication was pronounced against a head of state," neither Queen Elizabeth I nor Napoleon had changed policy. And there is reason to believe provocation would, as Margherita Marchione puts it, "have resulted in violent retaliation, the loss of many more Jewish lives, especially those then under the protection of the Church, and an intensification of the persecution of Catholics." Holocaust survivors such as Marcus Melchior, the chief rabbi of Denmark, argued that "if the pope had spoken out, Hitler would probably have massacred more than six million Jews and perhaps ten times ten million Catholics, if he had the power to do so." Robert M.W. Kempner called upon his experience at the Nuremberg trials to say (in a letter to the editor after Commentary published an excerpt from Guenter Lewy in 1964), "Every propaganda move of the Catholic Church against Hitlers Reich would have been not only provoking suicide, . . . but would have hastened the execution of still more Jews and priests."

This is hardly a speculative concern. A Dutch bishops pastoral letter condemning "the unmerciful and unjust treatment meted out to Jews" was read in Hollands Catholic churches in July 1942. The well-intentioned letter which declared that it was inspired by Pius XII backfired. As Pinchas Lapide notes: "The saddest and most thought-provoking conclusion is that whilst the Catholic clergy in Holland protested more loudly, expressly, and frequently against Jewish persecutions than the religious hierarchy of any other Nazi-occupied country, more Jews some 110,000 or 79 percent of the total were deported from Holland to death camps."

Bishop Jean Bernard of Luxembourg, an inmate of Dachau from 1941 to 1942, notified the Vatican that "whenever protests were made, treatment of prisoners worsened immediately." Late in 1942, Archbishop Sapieha of Cracow and two other Polish bishops, having experienced the Nazis savage reprisals, begged Pius not to publish his letters about conditions in Poland. Even Susan Zuccotti admits that in the case of the Roman Jews the pope "might well have been influenced by a concern for Jews in hiding and for their Catholic protectors."

One might ask, of course, what could have been worse than the mass murder of six million Jews? The answer is the slaughter of hundreds of thousands more. And it was toward saving those it could that the Vatican worked. The fate of Italian Jews has become a major topic of Piuss critics, the failure of Catholicism at its home supposedly demonstrating the hypocrisy of any modern papal claim to moral authority. (Notice, for example, Zuccottis title: Under His Very Windows.) But the fact remains that while approximately 80 percent of European Jews perished during World War II, 80 percent of Italian Jews were saved.In the months Rome was under German occupation, Pius XII instructed Italys clergy to save lives by all means.(A neglected source for Piuss actions during this time is the 1965 memoir But for the Grace of God, by Monsignor J. Patrick Carroll-Abbing, who worked under Pius as a rescuer.)

Beginning in October 1943, Pius asked churches and convents throughout Italy to shelter Jews. As a result and despite the fact that Mussolini and the Fascists yielded to Hitlers demand for deportations many Italian Catholics defied the German orders.In Rome, 155 convents and monasteries sheltered some five thousand Jews. At least three thousand found refuge at the popes summer residence at Castel Gandolfo. Sixty Jews lived for nine months at the Gregorian University, and many were sheltered in the cellar of the pontifical biblical institute. Hundreds found sanctuary within the Vatican itself. Following Piuss instructions, individual Italian priests, monks, nuns, cardinals, and bishops were instrumental in preserving thousands of Jewish lives.

Cardinal Boetto of Genoa saved at least eight hundred. The bishop of Assisi hid three hundred Jews for over two years.The bishop of Campagna and two of his relatives saved 961 more in Fiume. Cardinal Pietro Palazzini, then assistant vice rector of the Seminario Romano, hid Michael Tagliacozzo and other Italian Jews at the seminary (which was Vatican property) for several months in 1943 and 1944. In 1985, Yad Vashem, Israels Holocaust Memorial, honored the cardinal as a righteous gentile and, in accepting the honor, Palazzini stressed that "the merit is entirely Pius XIIs, who ordered us to do whatever we could to save the Jews from persecution." Some of the laity helped as well, and, in their testimony afterwards, consistently attributed their inspiration to the pope.

Again, the most eloquent testimony is the Nazis own. Fascist documents published in 1998 (and summarized in Marchiones Pope Pius XII) speak of a German plan, dubbed "Rabat-Fohn," to be executed in January 1944. The plan called for the eighth division of the SS cavalry, disguised as Italians, to seize St. Peters and "massacre Pius XII with the entire Vatican" and specifically names "the papal protest in favor of the Jews" as the cause. A similar story can be traced across Europe.

There is room to argue that more ought to have been attempted by the Catholic Church for the unanswerable facts remain that Hitler did come to power, World War II did occur, and six million Jews did die. But the place to begin that argument is with the truth that people of the time, Nazis and Jews alike, understood the pope to be the worlds most prominent opponent of the Nazi ideology:

As early as December 1940, in an article in Time magazine, Albert Einstein paid tribute to Pius: "Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitlers campaign for suppressing the truth. I never had any special interest in the Church before, but now I feel a great affection and admiration because the Church alone has had the courage and persistence to stand for intellectual truth and moral freedom. I am forced thus to confess that what I once despised, I now praise unreservedly."

In 1943, Chaim Weizmann, who would become Israels first president, wrote that "the Holy See is lending its powerful help wherever it can, to mitigate the fate of my persecuted co-religionists." Moshe Sharett, Israels second prime minister, met with Pius in the closing days of the war and "told him that my first duty was to thank him, and through him the Catholic Church, on behalf of the Jewish public for all they had done in the various countries to rescue Jews."

Rabbi Isaac Herzog, chief rabbi of Israel, sent a message in February 1944 declaring, "The people of Israel will never forget what His Holiness and his illustrious delegates, inspired by the eternal principles of religion, which form the very foundation of true civilization, are doing for our unfortunate brothers and sisters in the most tragic hour of our history, which is living proof of Divine Providence in this world."

In September 1945, Leon Kubowitzky, secretary general of the World Jewish Congress, personally thanked the pope for his interventions, and the World Jewish Congress donated $20,000 to Vatican charities "in recognition of the work of the Holy See in rescuing Jews from Fascist and Nazi persecutions."

In 1955, when Italy celebrated the tenth anniversary of its liberation, the Union of Italian Jewish Communities proclaimed April 17 a "Day of Gratitude" for the popes wartime assistance. On May 26, 1955, the Israeli Philharmonic Orchestra flew to Rome to give in the Vatican a special performance of Beethovens Seventh Symphony an expression of the State of Israels enduring gratitude to the pope for help given the Jewish people during the Holocaust.

This last example is particularly significant. As a matter of state policy, the Israeli Philharmonic has never played the music of Richard Wagner, because of his well-known reputation as "Hitlers composer," the cultural patron saint of the Third Reich. During the 1950s especially, the Israeli public, hundreds of thousands of whom were Holocaust survivors, still viewed Wagner as a symbol of the Nazi regime. It is inconceivable that the Israeli government would have paid for the entire orchestra to travel to Rome to pay tribute to "Hitlers pope."

On the contrary, the Israeli Philharmonics unprecedented concert in the Vatican was a unique communal gesture of collective recognition for a great friend of the Jewish people. Hundreds of other memorials could be cited. In her conclusion to Under His Very Windows, Susan Zuccotti dismissesas wrong-headed, ill-informed, or even devious the praise Pius XII received from Jewish leaders and scholars, as well as expressions of gratitude from the Jewish chaplains and Holocaust survivors who bore personal witness to the assistance of the pope.That she does so is disturbing. To deny the legitimacy of their gratitude to Pius XII is tantamount to denying the credibility of their personal testimony and judgment about the Holocaust itself. "More than all others," recalled Elio Toaff, an Italian Jew who lived through the Holocaust and later became chief rabbi of Rome, "we had the opportunity of experiencing the great compassionate goodness and magnanimity of the pope during the unhappy years of the persecution and terror, when it seemed that for us there was no longer an escape."

But Zuccotti is not alone. There is a disturbing element in nearly all the current work on Pius. Except for Rychlaks Hitler, the War and the Pope, none of the recent books from Cornwells vicious attack in Hitlers Pope to McInernys uncritical defense in The Defamation of Pius XII is finally about the Holocaust. All are about using the sufferings of Jews fifty years ago to force changes upon the Catholic Church today. It is this abuse of the Holocaust that must be rejected.

A true account of Pius XII would arrive, I believe, at exactly the opposite to Cornwells conclusion: Pius XII was not Hitlers pope, but the closest Jews had come to having a papal supporter and at the moment when it mattered most. Writing in Yad Vashem Studies in 1983, John S. Conway the leading authority on the Vaticans eleven-volume Acts and Documents of the Holy See During the Second World Warconcluded: "A close study of the many thousands of documents published in these volumes lends little support to the thesis that ecclesiastical self-preservation was the main motive behind the attitudes of the Vatican diplomats. Rather, the picture that emerges is one of a group of intelligent and conscientious men, seeking to pursue the paths of peace and justice, at a time when these ideals were ruthlessly being rendered irrelevant in a world of total war."

These neglected volumes (which the English reader can find summarized in Pierre Blets Pius XII and the Second World War) "will reveal ever more clearly and convincingly" - as John Paul told a group of Jewish leaders in Miami in 1987 "how deeply Pius XII felt the tragedy of the Jewish people, and how hard and effectively he worked to assist them." The Talmud teaches that "whosoever preserves one life, it is accounted to him by Scripture as if he had preserved a whole world." More than any other twentieth-century leader, Pius fulfilled this Talmudic dictum, when the fate of European Jewry was at stake. No other pope had been so widely praised by Jews and they were not mistaken. Their gratitude, as well as that of the entire generation of Holocaust survivors, testifies that Pius XII was, genuinely and profoundly, a righteous gentile.

Reprinted with permission from The Weekly Standard. All rights reserved.

Click Here to Donate Now!

Join the new media evangelization. Your tax-deductible gift allows to build a culture of life in our nation and throughout the world. Please help us promote the Church's new evangelization by donating to right now. God bless you for your generosity.




Post a Comment
Write a comment on this article

Email required (will not be published)
required Country

Most Popular